One way that board members behave in meetings comes from mirroring other members and the CEO. When nonprofit CEOs do too little leading, the board mirrors this behavior. They micromanage more. Is this a part of why your board micromanages? Read on to find out.
When I was 17 and a junior counselor, I learned how people mirror and magnify what leaders do. In the middle of a morning trip, I shared that I was hungry and wished we had brought snacks. The response was a very embarrassing barrage of complaining campers that ceased only when we arrived on campus 90 minutes later.
I was leading even though I was not the trip leader. I should have shared the snack idea in the trip debrief to be a better leader.
Just as I wanted to stop my camper from complaining, nonprofit CEOs want to prevent their boards from micromanaging. This is a valid goal! Like complaining, micromanaging is counterproductive, wasteful, and annoying.
This post asks if your behavior might be the inspiration for some of your board’s micromanaging habit. The question springs from my two decades working with 200+ nonprofit CEOs on entrenched board challenges.
Trying to decide if you buy the idea outlined in the overview?
Let’s start with what causes boards to micromanage:
1. Boards want to help
Your board members joined the board to serve. If you’ve recruited well, your members are eager to contribute. Micromanaging is a kind of help.
2. Micromanaging is easier
Relative to setting and establishing policy and strategy, managing takes less brain energy. And “people tend to take the path of least resistance.” Zoe Chance, Influence is Your Superpower
3. Strobe lights flashing
Our brains notice what’s different, esp. when it might indicate a problem. If your public works department installs a strobe light at your entrance as part of a road repair, your boards will discuss it.
4. Isopraxism
Members imitate others’ behaviors. “Mirroring, also called isopraxism, is essentially imitation. It’s another neurobehavior humans (and other animals) display in which we copy each other to comfort each other.” Chris Voss, Never Split the Difference
Board members don’t come to meetings thinking micromanaging is a good idea, but it happens without good meeting hygiene and people modeling leadership.
CEOs spend more time managing than leading, similar to boards. Execs want well-running nonprofits. Managing is also easier for them, and the metaphoric strobe lights also impact them. Finally, they mirror the behavior of others, including their board members, in meetings.
The critical difference between boards’ micromanaging and CEOs’ needing to lead more is that execs are short-staffed. Even though leading vs. managing is one of the most vital activities for nonprofit success, leading can feel like a “luxury” they can’t afford.
Nonprofit CEOs don’t want to manage so much. Yet, they’re unlikely to prioritize leading if they don’t understand the consequences of too much management.
Understanding the source of micromanaging allows CEOs to reframe the situation from “them doing it to you” to your board, well—being human. Understanding the similarity between board micromanaging and CEOs leading too little invites you to focus on tactics to change both behaviors for more wins.
When you understand the root causes of micromanaging behaviors and what you can do to change them, you’re close to empowering your board for lasting impact.
Yes, your board is following your lead. You have influence!
Maybe. Since boards mirror behavior, if the CEO focuses on managing, they’ll micromanage more.
Yes. If the CEO leads more, the board will lead more. Plus, the more a CEO leads, the more they grow skills to recognize the foggy space between managing and leading. So, the more they will be able to guide others to lead more!
It’s efficient! By changing your behavior, you get two benefits—doing more leading and better board input.
Example 1
The managing-focused CEO, making small talk before the meeting, said, “It’s been a crazy day. Two people were sick, and we had to do crisis management all day!”
The leading-focused CEO, making small talk, said, “It’s been a crazy day. I realized we need more cross-training for staff, and I hope we can chat about a strategy to invest in more staff development tonight.”
This second chat set the framework for a leadership conversation.
Example 2
The managing-focused CEO joins in on the fundraising detail discussions in staff meetings, the hallway, or the board room.
The leading-focused CEO notices that revenue anxiety is high. When the staff or board meeting goes micro, she reframes the discussion by asking a big-picture question.
Do you see the connection between when your board has micromanaged and the amount of time you manage before a meeting? For instance, when your board micromanaged last, what happened in your day?
Post in this series:
Quiz: Is Your Board Micromanaging? Find Out Now!–Engage with a self-assessment tool.
Why Does Your Nonprofit Board Micromanage? Is It You?– Understand one underlying causes of board micromanagement.
Lead More: How to Curb Your Board’s Micromanaging Habit– Get strategic advice on redirecting board behavior. (This post)
How to Stop Your Board from Micromanaging: Practical Steps– Concrete, actionable steps to prevent and stop board micromanagement.
Need more help with your board? Karen is available for a mini-consult or more. Click here to email or here to set a time to chat.
Karen Eber Davis provides customized advising and coaching around nonprofit strategy and board development. People leaders hire her to bring clarity to sticky situations, break through barriers that seem insurmountable, and align people for better futures. She is the author of 7 Nonprofit Income Streams and Let's Raise Nonprofit Millions Together.
If you appreciate these Added Value posts, please consider subscribing.